Part 3: Religious and spiritual landscapes — urban vs rural

Is there still a need in people’s lives to express their spirituality in some way, shape or form–and within community?  Our  western culture seems to have taken individuality to the extreme where religious community life has been secularized and devalued to the sidelines of life, and even ignored.  Participation in religious community life has now become totally voluntary… but maybe this is good.  It separates true and genuine Christian believers/seekers who voluntarily commit to their beliefs from those who follow Christianity due to involuntary happenstance or family heritage.  As religious community life becomes more marginalized, what distinguishes the visible church from the invisible church will be pared down.  The expression of true spirituality and religious life will become more apparent to secular eyes.

Morever, and more to my point, is that, people who voluntarily desire to become a part of an organized religious/faith community (a church) are not as prone to sliding into spiritual oblivion. Here’s a few cases I witnessed the past month that explains our human need to be in Christian community:

The other day, a stranger walked into our church during our prayer meeting.  he didn’t know us, and we didn’t know him from Adam.  I admired his courage to enter our church.  I suspect the reason why he came might have been motivated by his desire to express his thanks to God for getting him a new job, after having been unemployed for the last four months.  In our prayers together, I felt that our small prayer group was successful in helping him express his thankfulness to God for giving him a job.  I ended up giving him a bible to take home, and we all welcomed him to come again to join us for Sunday worship and Wednesday night prayer meetings (may the Holy Spirit continue working in his life).  Also another fellow had walked into our prayer meeting a month ago. I don’t know what motivated him to come but I sensed he had a need to come.  He wasn’t a complete stranger to the church because he says he knew someone from a while back.

All of us need to have  an outlet for spiritual expression.  Without it, we will ultimately become disconnected from true spirituality.  If the opportunity for one to access  such expressions are denied them, will their spirituality become lifeless and formless? 

[ next post expresses what we need to do about this disconnect. See previous post Part 2. ]

Leave a Comment

Filed under church, faith, ministry, missional, spirituality

Part 2: Religious and spiritual landscapes — urban vs rural

Have we, as a society, kept our spirituality hidden away too much from the eyes of others for the sake of being tolerant? 

In my move from rural to urban, I have also noticed a big difference in how people approach spirituality (as opposed to religion).   Spirituality in the urban setting (especially on the part of the postmodern generation), is much more individualized, where one person’s spirituality might not  be the same as another’s approach.  This is fine, but when one’s spiritual life is totally disconnected from the religious community life and privatized, there is a hidden danger.  When a person’s sense of spirituality goes dry and empty without some kind of organized religion to support and back them up, their spiritual lives can slide into oblivion.   They may lose their entire sense of spirituality and never know how far they’ve gone because no one is there to keep them accountable.

Has the expression of individual spirituality become too privatized?

[ next post expresses our lack or need of spiritual expression in society. ]

Leave a Comment

Filed under church, faith, ministry, missional, spirituality

Part 1: Religious and spiritual landscapes — urban vs rural

This will be the first post in a four part series.  I want to bring up and provoke some thoughts about differences in people’s attitudes toward religion and spirituality in both rural and urban settings. The Church is at a critical moment in the 21st century. Either we work to survive and thrive, or we curl up and die in a corner.  What has Christ called us to?

Have you noticed a difference in people’s attitudes toward religious and spiritual expression between rural and urban communities?

Having moved from a small community to a large one, I have noticed very big differences in the religious and spiritual landscapes between urban and rural settings.

In the rural setting, religion is still part of people’s normal everyday lives.  Whether or not they participate in organized religion, the established Christian church is there and is accepted as an integral part of the community.  It is funny how even non-church goers understand and accept the Christian church as  part of being people’s normal everyday life.  If the church were to collapse or close  in a rural community, there would be a marked void in their life because they will feel that something is missing.  I think this is due to how the church has remained somewhat integrated into the life of small communities.

In the urban setting, religion is hardly and rarely a part of people’s everyday lifestyle.  If a church is not sitting there in front of their face, it can very easily go unnoticed and be forgotten.  Furthermore, the impact of the Christian church is minimal and hardly felt in the midst of the busy and changing marketplace.  If an urban church were to suddenly disappear due to deconstruction to make room for a new condo and business developments, most people won’t even notice.  They will have forgotten that a church had even existed on intersection of Main Street and Central Avenue.

How is your local church integrated into your community (rural or urban)? Would there be an impact in your immediate community if your local congregation were to burn down or suddenly disappear?

[ next post touches on society’s approach to finding a connection with their spiritual lives. ]

Leave a Comment

Filed under church, faith, ministry, missional, spirituality

Bart Ehrman vs Craig Evans at Acadia University

Another great debate is coming up.  Dr. Ehrman, a former evangelical turned agnostic, is going head-to-head again with Dr. Craig Evans. This time at Acadia University and St. Mary’s University, in in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Ehrman and Evans are going to debate each other again for two days. They might be sick of each other at the end, or maybe, one might convert the other?…Not.  This should be interesting because they understand each other’s theology and points of view well.  Theological spars like this are interesting because when both hold strongly to their own convictions.  One might wonder why either do not come to the same conclusions.

Anyway, this will be very interesting. I wish I could be there myself, but unfortunately it’s way over in Atlantic Canada.  If you in Nova Scotia, check it out. [Tickets seem to be all gone now.  Maybe they'll make the DVD or recording available online].  But there’s an “After the Debate will be held at Rock Church the next day, Saturday, Jan. 21 9:00-3:30PM.

Friday, January 20 at 7PM at Acadia University, and
Thursday, January 19 at 7PM at Mary’s University
Admission is FREE [SOLD OUT]

Acadia University and St. Mary’s University
www.Religionsoup.ca

Sponsored by The Navigators

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

News of my family’s life-changes

Grace and peace to readers of the New Epistles blog.  It’s been a while since my last blog post. In this month of November, our family has been undergoing a big life-change. We have moved to new place (Brampton, Ontario located in the Greater Toronto Area). This change was stressful at first but we are getting used to it. There are different things to deal with: new environment, new home, planning on a new school for our daughter, new church, new working relationships, etc. We have been finding ways to cope with the new changes of living in a new place and getting to know new faces and names. Such life changes are never easy so I have empathy for anyone who has gone through this.

The reason for our move is that I’ve taken on a new call in a new congregation and denomination. I’ve moved from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Canada to the Canadian Baptists of Ontario and Quebec. This means some different ways to “doing” church. At the outset, it may also seem like different ways of “thinking” church, but for me personally, it won’t be that different since my spirituality is rooted in evangelicalism. There will be some things I will definitely miss (e.g., Apostles’ Creed, church seasons, etc.).

On a sub-note, we will be recognizing the start of Advent with the lighting of the advent candles this coming Sunday (which I learned was a recent tradition that was started in this congregation about four years ago). It may even be addressed by someone one of these Sundays during our childrens’ talk (if not by myself).  This Sunday, I will be preaching on Isaiah 64:1-9  and will be titled: “We are the work of God’s Hands”.  I hope to challenge my congregation to think of God’s work in our lives as a vital necessity in our spiritual lives.

The theological language between the two churches may be a little different but through my years worshiping and growing in the Lutheran Church and evangelical churches, I feel that I’ve have been stretched. My wide exposure and experience have challenged me to use theological-speak without losing the crux of the theological idea. I have found that being trained in various ecclesiologies and theologies has broadened my scope of ministry methods. It has enabled me to become more versatile in ministry, leadership, and in communicating the gospel, and sometimes, find myself searching for different ways to bridge the gap of understanding.

I am sure there are many other Christians who have traveled between various denominations. There differences may seem big at first, but as one becomes accustomed to the differences, they seem to shrink as time goes by.

Anyone else out there who has, or is, going through similar life-changes?

7 Comments

Filed under denominations, life

Christian churches attacked by Muslim extremists

Sometimes I wonder if political liberation is always a good thing—at least for Christians around the world.  Egypt’s Coptic Christians and churches have been under attack again since yesterday.  Muslim extremists just burned down a church and has sparked new protests. (read New York Times and Catholic Online)

Since President Hosni Mubarak was kicked out, these Egyptian extremists are beginning to think they have free reign to persecute Christians.  Same thing happened to Iraqi Christians after Saddam Hussein was on the run.  It may be a political game of choose the leader who will hinder your personal interest the least—not necessarily choose who you think would make the best leader for the nation.

2 Comments

Filed under church, current affairs

The elusive kingdom: some of modern scholarship’s problem

I have a problem getting into books by Robert Funk, John Spong, John Dominic Crossan. Now I understand why.  A part of the reason is their eschatology and their understanding of the “kingdom of God”.  Jesus did not call his disciples to find their inner, mystical selves, or to form an egalitarian community.  They were called to proclaim a message of repentance of sins and seek the kingdom of God that would transform the world.

The Jesus Seminar of Robert Funk has misunderstood both eschatology and Jesus’ proclamation of the “kingdom of God”, and so it rejects eschatology and misinterprets what Jesus meant by “kingdom of God”.  “When the Jesus Seminar interprets Jesus in a non-eschatological way, the Seminar is rejecting the idea that in proclaiming the kingdom of God, Jesus was proclaiming the end of the world”, says Craig Evans.   If the Jesus Seminar’s rejection of the eschatological kingdom was a reaction to an “end of the world” type of imminent apocalyptic theology, then their reaction is wrong-headed.  However, Jesus’ eschatology involved God’s rule breaking into the present world.

The bible does express a sense of urgency in the words of Jesus; he did say that the time was ripe for spiritual discernment and for God’s righteousness and judgment to come into our world.  Modern liberal scholarship did not like this the imminent end-of-the-world type of eschatology, and as a result, they totally eliminated an eschatological Jesus for a non-eschatological Jesus.  This is like “throwing the baby out with the bath water”.  Bruce Chilton describes Jesus’ Seminar’s elusive problem of Jesus being eschatological:  “Unhappiness with eschatology as the primary reference of the kingdom is easily converted into an equation of the kingdom with whatever the going orthodoxy is: the kingdom is the Church (so Carmignac), the kingdom of the Christ (so Dodd), the kingdom is the mystical experience of the sage Jesus (so Borg), or his philosophy in a Hellenistic key (so Mack)”.

Proponents of a non-eschatological kingdom bear the burden of proof.  There are many references of a definitive future in Jesus’ sayings, and of final judgment in Jewish writings (Aramaic, Greek, and Hebrew).  Jesus scholars have been stuck in endless debate between the eschatological kingdom vs a non-eschatology kingdom.  Modern liberal scholars need to see the meanings beyond eschatology in Jesus’ proclamation.

3 Comments

Filed under theology

Top ten theologians

Over at the Parchment & Pen blog, they’ve started a new interesting series called “Top Ten Theologians” (throughout all of church history). I added my personal top ten but divided them into two lists:
1/ from antiquity to the Reformation; and
2/ Modern era
(and NOT in any particular order because that would be too difficult). Here they are:

From antiquity to Reformation era:
Augustine
Aquinas
Luther
Calvin
Irenaeus
Basil
Ambrose
Origen
Tertullian
Anselm

Modern era:
Karl Barth
Norman Geisler
J.I. Packer
R.C. Sproul
Jonathan Edwards
John T. Mueller
Helmut Thiellicke
Wolfhart Pannenberg
C.F.W. Walther
[added:]  N.T. Wright (forgot the tenth)

 

Leave a Comment

Filed under theology

Atheist calls atheist a “coward”

Atheist Richard Dawkins has chickened-out of a philosophical debate with Christian apologist William Lane Craig.     Dawkins has debated other Christians but refuses to debate Craig.  Why?  Craig has debated atheist Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris and he has no fear of debating Dawkins. Why does Dawkins refuse to debate Craig?  Maybe he fears the challenge?  There is a challenge coming up Oct. 25, 2011 at Oxford.  Will Dawkins show up?

I’m not a advocate of fights.  Such are reserved for ringside seats at the wrestling rings.  However, debates such as these help thinking people hash out the existence or non-existence of God, and other meaningful philosophical issues regarding the reason for our existence.  Would such philosophical debates be useful for most common people?

Leave a Comment

Filed under theology

The Christian Mind

Ligonier Ministries 2012 National Conference (March 15-17 in Orlando) from Ligonier on Vimeo.

Leave a Comment

Filed under conferences

Does a genuine shell cordovan bible exist?

What do dress shoes have to do with bibles?  Not much except for the misnomer of “cordovan”.  I was wondering if genuine shell cordovan leather bibles really exist.  To date, I have found none.  To ask this is almost like asking if water exists on the moon.  It might but it hasn’t been discovered and/or confirmed.

Today, we have confusion about what is truly cordovan.  There are bibles that have “cordovan” in its name but it only refers to the color of the bible.  Cordovan is mostly being incorrectly used by many to describe the color of the leather (as they do with shoe wax polish).  This is because the natural color of cordovan is burgundy.   Some bible bloggers have blogged about it (here) but even the cordovan they’re talking about is not genuine shell cordovan. Then why are publishers not using the proper term of “burgundy”? Perhaps to add some value to their bibles?  Probably.  But one must be clear; “burgundy” does not equal genuine shell “cordovan”.

Not many actually know about shell cordovan, and to most people, it really doesn’t make any difference to them.  It is not from the cow.  Genuine shell cordovan is the most coveted material in men’s leather shoes.  It is leather from the hide (butt) of the horse and not just any skin off the horse type of leather.  Such genuine shell cordovan leather (by Horween, USA) is used in the manufacture of men’s dress shoes, like Alden’s and Allen Edmonds in the U.S., plus others in the UK and Europe.  These shoes can cost upwards of US$550-600.   Gulp.  Click here to see the manufacturing process of true cordovan.

Since the cost of shell cordovan leather shoes is sky-high, it would be safe to say that are no bible manufacturers in existence today that would want to use this valuable material on its bible covers.  They would never sell (unless the buyer sees such value in the “word of God”.   I have yet to see one on these on the bookshelves of a bible bookstore.  What might be the cost of such a bible?  I dare not say.  Any guesses out there?

Here are some bibles (Amazon.com, CBD) that incorrectly uses “cordovan” in its name but upon closer examination of the leather, the natural grains give it away.  It’s really fine calfskin (nice calfskin for sure…would love to have one on my bookshelf) but it’s still not genuine shell cordovan. Does one exists out there? If so, send me a pic.

4 Comments

Filed under bibles

Debate: Wallace vs Ehrman — “Can we trust the text of the New Testament?”

A great debate is coming up:

Daniel B. Wallace vs Bart D. Ehrman
Both biblical scholars–one conservative evangelical, the other, a former fundamentalist become liberal-atheist.

Topic:Can we trust the text of the New Testament?
Date: Oct. 1, 2011
Time: 7:00PM
Place: Dallas, TX
Sponsored by: Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (web: CSNTM)

Since it will be all the way in Dallas, TX, the Friends of CSNTM website says a DVD will be available for purchase. It might be worth ordering.

2 Comments

Filed under textual issue, theology

What’s a Lutheran? Let a traditional Lutheran explain it

If you’re an Evangelical, have you ever wondered how a traditional-orthodox Lutheran might feel about him or herself?  Or how a traditional Lutheran pastor might feel about Evangelicals?

I just came across an interview posted at The Gospel Coalition blog titled “Those Dern Lutherans“.  Blogger and Reformed pastor, Rev. Kevin DeYoung (RCA), interviewed Rev. Paul T. McCain, an orthodox Missouri Synod Lutheran pastor (LCMS) who is the editor at Concordia Publishing House, and who blogs at Cyberbrethren.  Let me say that he sure can tell you what Lutheranism is about. I have been a reader of his blog for years.    I’m not a traditional born-and-bred Lutheran; I’m an evangelical transplanted into the Lutheran church–so I provide this disclaimer–”What I say about Lutheranism is not necessarily representative of most Lutherans”. In this interview, Pastor Paul says it well.

Question 9. “Anything else you think the world needs to know about Lutherans?”

Answer: “I would say this: I think Evangelicals often find themselves searching for something they feel might be a bit “missing” in their Christian walk, and think that Rome or Eastern Orthodoxy may fit the bill, while all the while Lutheranism is there, right around the corner. Often when they find a traditional Lutheran Church they are surprised to find a robust, rich worship life, rooted in the Scripture (which is what the liturgy is, in its entirety). They find a rich focus on Christ and the Gospel–Lutherans are adamant that Christ is the heart and center of everything, and they also find a tangible experience with God, not based simply on feelings or emotions, but on a concrete and objective experience with God’s grace through the sacraments. And all this is wrapped up in such a vibrant passionate love for Jesus. We Lutherans combine the best of what is Evangelical, with the best of what is truly catholic about the Church, with the rich heritage of the Lutheran Reformation. I think it is a winning combination, but of course, I’m kind of biased.” (…Read full interview)

I think he’s right in what he says about some Evangelicals–whether we admit it or not.  Evangelical theology has much to learn from Lutheran theology, albeit, the opposite is true too.  The same goes for worship-liturgy too.  If you’re Lutherans, sorry but the vice versa is true too.

When all is said and done, I can honestly say that every denomination, church, or tradition, e.g., Lutheran, Presbyterian, Evangelical, etc., we have much to learn from one another.

Leave a Comment

Filed under church, evangelicals

Movie: The Grace Card, out on DVD August 16

Question: “Is it easier to receive grace than it is to offer grace to those who don’t like us?

This question represents the crux of this life-changing movie.  The movie: The Grace Card (2011) is a powerful movie that personally touched me in a big way. The movie is about two police officers, one whom is also a part-time Nazarene pastor who is challenged by his partner’s dislike of him.  They both learn about grace and forgiveness–big time.

Okay, I admit a few tears flowed near the end (and I don’t cry easily).   Talking about offering forgiveness to someone you don’t like is easier said than done.  When it comes down to actually forgiving others, it’s a different story.  As I watched this movie, I was challenged and reminded about the power of God’s forgiveness working in the lives of Christian believers.  The film did this in a very powerful way for me recently. I was reminded that, rather than justice, it is forgiveness that brings healing to broken hearts in our world.  It will definitely inspire viewers to depend upon the power of God who strengthens us. It will also inspire us to offer others the gift of forgiveness to those who do not necessarily love or like us.  What an awesome example of what grace can do!

It came out in theaters back in February 2011 and is now available on DVD starting August 16, 2011.  It’s a well-made quality movie. Go get it and show it in church, your youth group, or just watch it at home.  Available at: Christianbook.comOutreach.com or at your local Christian bookstore.

Leave a Comment

Filed under movies

Justin Bieber’s mom’s testimony of salvation

I just finished watching the Justin Bieber movie and wanted to find out more about his family’s life.  I was surprised to learn of his mother’s Pattie Mallette’s testimony of how she received Jesus Christ into her life as a young rebellious teenager.  She raised Justin Bieber as a single mom which was very difficult.  This was Justin Bieber before he was “Justin Bieber” the 15 year-old music sensation, and before his first recording contract. There are four parts to the interview : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 (with Justin)

I hope that Justin and mom Pattie will remain true in their faith and in their relationship with the Lord. Below is a clip from 100 Huntley Street.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized